Skip to content

Website cookies

This website uses cookies to help us understand the way visitors use our website. We can't identify you with them and we don't share the data with anyone else. If you click Reject we will set a single cookie to remember your preference. Find out more in our privacy policy.

Women’s experiences of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in labour: A qualitative study

08 January 2025

Topics and programmes


Jennifer MacLellan a, Mo Ade b, Bev Fitzsimons c, Sara Kenyon d, Sumayya Mulla b, Catherine Pope e, Julia Sanders f, Rachel Rowe a

a National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford,

b Expert by experience contributor, UK

c Point of Care Foundation

d Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham

e Nuffield Department of Primary Healthcare Sciences, University of Oxford

f School of Healthcare Sciences, Heath Park campus, Cardiff University

 

Abstract

Background

Internationally, intermittent auscultation (IA) is recommended for monitoring the fetal heart rate during labour and birth for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. IA can identify changes in the fetal heart rate that may indicate the need for additional care or intervention. IA is a central facet of midwifery practice, but there is little evidence about women’s experience of IA.

 

Methods

Between February and May 2023, 23 women were recruited through social media, service user organisations and charities, for a single episode, online interview or focus group with informed consent. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematically analysed.

 

Findings

The analysis constructed two over-arching themes: ‘Choice takes work’ and ‘Impact of IA monitoring on the labouring woman’.

 

Discussion

Women reported a lack of informed decision-making in relation to intrapartum fetal monitoring. The experience of our participants showed that not all women for whom IA would be recommended according to current clinical guidelines were offered it, while others experienced IA without understanding its function or the availability of other options.

 

Conclusion

Limited antenatal communication from maternity care professionals about fetal monitoring in labour has an impact on women’s opportunities to make informed decisions. A committed approach to informed decision-making in the antenatal period could reduce practice variation and better support midwives to support women in their birth choices.

 


Download the (PDF, 478KB)